Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navdeep Singh Virk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence was shown in this discussion, that heading a police force in a city of X population meets our criteria for notability. Therefore, this article's subject is found to lack the required notability for inclusion. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 03:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Navdeep Singh Virk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non Notable mid level police officer. Merely holding the post of Commissioner of a city in India does not show notability. Uncletomwood (talk) 06:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Commands the police in a city of nearly 900,000 people. In my opinion that shows sufficient notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just heading the Police force for a city (with a tenure of hardly 1-2 years) without doing anything notable makes him notable enough? Uncletomwood (talk) 16:47, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. Just like serving in a national legislature for three days does (see WP:POLITICIAN)! -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:36, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can;t see how that policy cann be applied here. Uncletomwood (talk) 16:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sarcasm. What's so special about a politician? Yet they get inherent notability just for sitting in a legislature. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:43, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever that meant. He's anyway transferred out of the post. Uncletomwood (talk) 15:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:23, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 03:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 ^talk 00:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 00:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This article should be deleted as the person in question is a mid level officer. Gurgaon is not a metro City. Page is promotional and autobiographical with exaggerations. While we do have some biographies of very senior police officers—mainly those with direct responsibility for major metro areas—we've never usually hosted biographies of officials at this level of smaller cities. Plus, the article appears to be heavily padded with things which happened to occur on his watch, rather than things for which he was directly responsible. Uncletomwood (talk) 16:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable police officer, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 21:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as his position is not convincing for actually establishing independence. SwisterTwister talk 19:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.